A German Says WHUUUUUUUUUUT???

This isn't much of a blog, but something you all should read.

Mathias Dapfner,
Chief Executive of the huge German publisher Axel Springer AG, has written a
blistering attack in DIE WELT, Germany's largest daily paper, against
the timid reaction of Europe in the face of the Islamic threat.

EUROPE - THY NAME IS COWARDICE
(Commentary by Mathias Dapfner CEO, Axel
Springer, AG)
A few days ago Henry Broder wrote in Welt am Sonntag, "Europe - your
family name is appeasement." It's a phrase you can't get out of your
head because it's so terribly true. Appeasement cost millions of Jews and non-Jews their lives, as
England and France, allies at the time, negotiated and hesitated too
long before they noticed that Hitler had to be fought, not bound to
toothless agreements.
Appeasement legitimized and stabilized Communism in the Soviet Union,
then East Germany, then all the rest of Eastern Europe, where for decades,
inhuman suppressive, murderous governments were glorified as the
ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities.
Appeasement crippled Europe when genocide ran rampant in Kosovo, and
even though we had absolute proof of ongoing mass-murder, we Europeans
debated and debated and debated, and were still debating when finally the
Americans had to come from halfway around the world, into Europe yet
again, and do our work for us.
Rather than protecting democracy in the Middle East, European
Appeasement, camouflaged behind the fuzzy word "equidistance," now
countenances suicide bombings in Israel by fundamentalist Palestinians.
Appeasement generates a mentality that allows Europe to ignore nearly
500,000 victims of Saddam's torture and murder machinery and,
motivated by the self-righteousness of the peace movement, has the gall to issue
bad grades to George Bush... Even as it
is uncovered that the loudest critics of the American action in Iraq
made illicit billions, no! , TENS of billions, in the corrupt U.N.
Oil-for-Food program.
And now we are faced with a particularly grotesque form of
appeasement. How is Germany reacting to the escalating violence by Islamic
Fundamentalists in Holland and elsewhere? By suggesting that we really
should have a "Muslim Holiday" in Germany?
, but I am not. A substantial fraction of our (German) Government, and
if the polls are to be believed, the German people, actually believe that
creating an Official State "Muslim Holiday" will somehow spare us from the wrath of the fanatical
Islamists.
One cannot help but recall Britain's Neville Chamberlain waving the
laughable treaty signed by Adolph Hitler and declaring European "Peace
in our time".
What else has to happen before the European public and its political
leadership get it? There is a sort of crusade underway, an especially
perfidious crusade consisting of systematic attacks by fanatic
Muslims, focused on civilians, directed against our
free, open Western societies, and intent upon Western Civilization's
utter destruction.
It is a conflict that will most likely last longer than any of the
great military conflicts of the last century – a conflict conducted by an
enemy that cannot be tamed by "tolerance" and
"accommodation" but is actually spurred on by such gestures, which
have proven to be, and will always be taken by the Islamists for signs of
weakness. Only two recent American Presidents had the courage needed
for Anti-appeasement: Reagan and Bush.
His American critics may quibble over the details, but we Europeans
know the truth. We saw it first hand: Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War,
freeing half of the German people from nearly 50 years of terror and virtual
slavery. Bush, supported only by the Social Democrat Blair, acting on moral conviction, recognized the
danger in the Islamic War against Democracy. His place in history will have
to be evaluated after a number of years have passed.
In the meantime, Europe sits back with charismatic self-confidence in
the multicultural corner, instead of defending liberal society's values
and being an attractive center of power on the same playing field as the true great powers, America and
China.
On the contrary - we Europeans present ourselves, in contrast to those
"arrogant Americans", as the World Champions of "tolerance", which
even (Germany's Interior Minister) Otto Schily justifiably criticizes. Why?
Because we're so moral? I fear it's more because we're so materialistic, so devoid of a moral compass.
For his policies, Bush risks the fall of the dollar, huge amounts of
additional national debt, and a massive and persistent burden on the
American economy - because unlike almost all of Europe, Bush realizes
what is at stake - literally everything.
While we criticize the "capitalistic robber barons" of America because
they seem too sure of their priorities, we timidly defend our Social
Welfare systems. Stay out of it! It could get expensive! We'd rather
discuss reducing our 35-hour workweek or our
dental coverage, or our 4 weeks of paid vacation... Or listen to TV
pastors preach about the need to "reach out to terrorists. To
understand and forgive".
These days, Europe reminds me of an old woman who, with shaking hands,
frantically hides her last pieces of jewelry when she notices a robber
breaking into a neighbor's house. Appeasement? Europe, thy name is
Cowardice.

Snippety Snip Snip

A Kinder Cut

Apparently a circumcised weiner reduces your chances of getting HIV from a woman by 60%. This makes perfect sense, considring you're actually removing a fold where shit can get stuck. (Gross, huh?) Furthermore, the removal of the foreskin actually hardens the glans and renders it more difficult for HIV to get into.

They estimate that if every male in Africa were circumcised 6,000,000 AIDS cases would be avoided each year. That fuckin' rules. Remember, most of the people that get AIDS here are homosexuals, and the majority over there are hetero, and they transmit the disease because they have no idea how seminal fluid works, etc.

Send the moils to Africa! Let's have an African Bris Fest!

Hahaha... sorry, this isn't a laughing matter, but at least there's some benefit to doing it, other than the fact that you won't look like a freak.

Let's go have sex!

A Sports First...

Okay, this is the first time I'm gonna break down and talk about something in sports.

Alex Rodriguez gets more shit from EVERYONE in the sports world than fucking Pete "The Better" Rose. I don't think either did anything wrong, but someone needs to stand up and say something. A-Rod gets hassled by the New York fans on a regular basis. I know they're harsh as average people, and are harsh as sports fans, but god damn.

The guy makes an error, and he gets booed. He hits a game winning homerun and gets a standing-o. He makes an error and they don't even give up a run and he gets booed.

All right, I get it. They have NASTY expectations. That's fine.

However, the real reason that I brought this point up, is that I just took a poll on ESPN's SportsNation, and 70.2% of 10,000+ voted that when A-Rod slapped the ball out of Bronson Arroyo's glove in the 2004 ALCS, they "thought less of him as a player." (The other option was "More" of a player.)

I selected "More."

The guy is running to a base, and realizes he's going to get tagged out. Baseball has a rule, that you can't run outside the basepath or you'll be called out. So, his options are, get tagged and be over it, or try to do something else.

Granted, he could have stuck his arms in the air, danced around, and started screaming in an attempt to throw Bronson off his game, but that's a bit far-fetched, as well as unlikely to succeed. Instead, A-Rod attempted to replicate a catcher-crunching hit at the plate to knock the ball loose, and tried to slap it out of Bronson's glove. (The ball actually came out, too) Unfortunately for Alex, they called him out anyway, because the ball hit him first and apparently you can't interfere with the ball.

First of all, I think this poses a problem for baseball's ruling authority, because running into the catcher effectively does the exact same thing, doesn't it? I don't know the rulebook by hand and I'm not even going to look it up and read it, because my major point lies further into the examination of A-Rod's thought process.

If he were to get tagged out, people would be sad, and he'd probably be blamed for not getting a solid hit or putting the ball over the fence. Instead, he didn't get a hit, something GREAT baseball players can only do 35% of the time. Doesn't the fact that the guy tried to slap the ball out of his opponent's glove demonstrate his utmost desire to get on base and help his team? Doesn't it show that he was doing all he could to get to that base? Doesn't it show that he would try ANYTHING, as strange as it may seem, to help the Yankees win?

OF COURSE IT DOES. It may have been a stupid play, and he might have known that it wouldn't work, but you sure as hell can't say the play makes you think LESS of him as a player.

Fucking morons with votes...

I hate you all.

That's What a Hamburger's All About...

I couldn't be happier to inform you all that In-N-Out has decided to stay a private company and continue to stick with the same simple menu. There has been a ton of pressure on the family-owned corporation to go public or to sell to a larger company for nationwide (perhaps worldwide) expansion. However, the family will continue to reign and keep the company as is.

They worry about going too big, too fast and wonder if they'll lose the mystique and loyalty associated with the chain. I couldn't agree more. When these companies go big, they lose their feel, they change their menu, and suddenly everyone knows who they are and what they're about. As for In-N-Out, they're rated with the highest customer satisfaction of any fast food chain. They have hamburgers, cheeseburgers, fries, drinks, and shakes. That's it. Everybody loves it, and everyone feels like a part of something that others aren't. New Yorkers don't know what In-N-Out is all about (pun slightly intended), and I like to keep it that way. Up until 8 years ago or so, I only knew a handful of people that knew what "animal-style" was. You must agree that there is some sort of cult following associated with In-N-Out... the religious writings on the cups, the crossed palm trees in front of every restaurant, the awesome, fresh food. I would attribute it all to being small and staying focused.

Look at Baja Fresh, for instance. They were tiny, had only a few stores in Newbury Park and Thousand Oaks (near where I grew up) and had lines out the friggin' doors all day long. Then they popped up in Beverly Hills, the SFV, and LA. Things continued to go well...

Then Wendy's steps in, changes the menu (a little so far, but I'd bet it will change a lot soon), and sales take a dive (not majorly, yet.... YET.) But the main point is that people like myself don't feel associated with that grass-roots type of restaurant like I did before anyone knew about it. It's just like Rubio's now, and I waste my breath trying to defend Baja, saying it was the original. I have no more ground to stand on, thanks to Wendy's.

If only companies that get a great idea would stick to being a representative of that great idea rather than turning to outright capitalism and hegemony. In-N-Out should never change their menu, and should continue to only expand at a slow rate to keep that mystique. I guarantee you they'll be full and successful as always.

Who really minds waiting for a double-double?

Holy Shitballs...

I'm not going to link you to this, because I have a feeling that you're not reading my links. Read this:

WSJ: Scholar Warns Iran's Ahmadinejad May Have 'Cataclysmic Events' In Mind For August 22
Tue Aug 08 2006 10:22:35 ET

In a WALL STREET JOURNAL op-ed Tuesday, Princeton's Bernard Lewis writes: "There is a radical difference between the Islamic Republic of Iran and other governments with nuclear weapons. This difference is expressed in what can only be described as the apocalyptic worldview of Iran's present rulers."

"In Islam as in Judaism and Christianity, there are certain beliefs concerning the cosmic struggle at the end of time -- Gog and Magog, anti-Christ, Armageddon, and for Shiite Muslims, the long awaited return of the Hidden Imam, ending in the final victory of the forces of good over evil, however these may be defined."

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad "and his followers clearly believe that this time is now, and that the terminal struggle has already begun and is indeed well advanced. It may even have a date, indicated by several references by the Iranian president to giving his final answer to the US about nuclear development by Aug. 22," which this year corresponds "to the 27th day of the month of Rajab of the year 1427. This, by tradition, is the night when many Muslims commemorate the night flight of the prophet Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to 'the farthest mosque,' usually identified with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back (c.f., Koran XVII.1).

"This might well be deemed an appropriate date for the apocalyptic ending of Israel and if necessary of the world. It is far from certain that Mr. Ahmadinejad plans any such cataclysmic events precisely for Aug. 22. But it would be wise to bear the possibility in mind."

---Courtesy of DrudgeReport.com

Now, I don't know who this "scholar" is, but if he's right, there's gonna be some SHIT GOING DOWN. Thank God it's across the globe, but this has NASTY WWIII implications. If Iran were to do the ultimate and nuke Israel, we would surely do the same to them, or at least carpet bomb the shit out of that place. Then all of the middle east would be involved, let alone what North Korea, China, and Russia would do. I would venture to say that the Chinese and Russians would venture to stay out, but if NK decided to send some shit at Japan or us, China would most likely be telling Kim Jon-Il to chill out, but would be on the verge of attacking us if we were to "miss" and hit any sort of Chinese soil.

Remember, the Chinese need us for our import/export ratio... they are not such sworn enemies as many people assume.

However, this could get nasty, really quick.

This is all speculation of course, but God damn, just think about how a person, in 2006, possesses these types of thoughts and beliefs. AND HE'S RUNNING A WORLD POWER!

Talk all the shit you want about George W. Bush, (and I'll bet you're ignorant to much of the truth anyway), but at least he has a bit of a better attitude towards life on this planet.

This Iranian fuck really scares me, and he should scare you too.

He's providing military assistance to Hezbollah AND Kim Jong-Il (who is no quiet party at the button-pressers anonymous meetings).

Pre-empt? hahahahahhaahaaha...

no. But damn, think about it.

What the F*ck Do You Expect?!?

In this article , on CNN.com and this other article , through Drudge, journalists are somewhat taken aback by the fact that members of our military in Iraq are taking drugs and getting drunk.

Granted, these articles are really about the accusations that Spc. James P. Barker, Sgt. Paul E. Cortez, Pfc. Jesse V. Spielman and Pfc. Bryan L. Howard raped and murdered a 14 year old girl, then killed her parents. However, I find it puzzling that CNN posts this article under the title, "Stress Sent Soldiers to Drink and Drugs."

Shouldn't this be fucking obvious? America's suburban and city youths are turning to drinking and drugs to deal with the bullshit that our society puts out, are we to assume that our soldiers don't do the same in the hell-hole otherwise known as Iraq?

You're half way across the globe. You are surrounded by people who either love you or hate you, and thousands of which would like to kill you. It's hot, REALLY hot. You have piss poor water, shitty food, and did I mention that you're being bombed or shot at?

Mother Teresa would pick up a bottle.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating for these guys if they in fact raped and killed that little girl and her family, but I can definitely see how it could happen. And I don't even think it's due to the drugs or the drinking, but don't add emphasis on that point. It should be well-assumed that these guys are getting smashed when they can...

they're in hell.

Slow News Day...

By current standards, and based on the last few weeks of non-stop Israeli-Hezbollah War coverage, today was a slow news day. Drudge ran this article as his headline for the majority of the day:

Douchebag Edits Photos for Emphasis

Apparently, some Lebanese photographer was caught editing his war photos from Lebanon. Reuters only found two that he actually doctored. I don't know about you, but when I first heard of it, I was assuming he was putting dead bodies in places where there weren't, showing cruelty that actually wasn't there, or something of that nature.

When you really look at what he did, it's quite laughable. He made the smoke rising over the city darker and thicker. Oooooooooh, scary. Now, I'm not saying that he shouldn't be reprimanded (Reuters says they won't use his photos anymore), it's just not THAT big of a deal. For Drudge to put this as his main story indicates how quickly our news becomes "old."

In fact, there was a study released on Drudge a few months ago that stated that after 36 hours, news is considered old.

That was a bit of a side-note, but back to my original point:

There's a Federal Reserve meeting tomorrow, and Drudge has no word of it.

There are still bombing runs being done in Israel and Lebanon, and Drudge has no word of it.

(This is all extremely surprising to me, by the way, because Drudge is always on top of the massive stories immediately.)

I think my main point, is that after two weeks of Israel and Hezbollah, we're totally bored of the situation as Americans. Our troops aren't involved, our people aren't involved (most of us, anyway), and we are sick of hearing about how many people died or how many rockets were launched. I'm not advocating this attitude, but it just goes to show you how blissfully ignorant our culture is. Do people even think about 9/11 nowadays?

Lime Expired

It looks like the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) has taken another swing at us (at least me) music piraters. You all remember the Napster deal, where the RIAA successfully sued Napster for encouraging music piracy.

The problem with Napster was that it housed all the music onto a trackable server, and it was easy to declare the music stolen and transmitted amongst millions for free.

The gnutella network was supposed to be the final out, or at least a much better option because the files are shared amongst an untrackable network of people. Each person connects and makes his or her music available for download (other things than music are available as well), and each person is securely connected while file transfers are made. The brilliant part was that the recording industry wouldn't be able to track each individual person and track them down for copywrite infringement. However, today marks a major setback in our efforts to keep getting free music.

Limewire Sued

Due to previous cases and precedents that allow the RIAA and others to sue because companies like Limewire "encourage" file swapping and sharing (of copywritten material), Limewire will inevitably be shut down. Hopefully us hackers will score another one back at 'em eventually. I'll keep you updated when I find some new file sharing stuff to run with.

Remember, if you like a band, download their shit, but BUY IT TOO!

Peace

Hey Cuba, Help Yourself, But Do It Over There

Condi to Preach from the Hypocratic Fence

As you should know, especially if you're reading my blog, Castro is dying. Fidel Castro, of Cuba. The country the United States has held an embargo against since February 7, 1962. Thus, we are partly responsible for the economic and social plight of this country. The Cuban people have very little money and very few rights, and have no recourse to get away from the government that Castro has set up. In an ideal world, the Cubans could make money and share it amongst the population, to serve their communistic ends. I don't think this is simply a case where the country makes money and holds it from the people for thier own benefit. Granted, Castro lives better than the rest of the population, but this sort of thing is to be expected. In reality there is just no money to be made because Cuba can hardly trade with any major economies.

We are the biggest proponent of keeping the embargo and thus, slashing their economic abilities as a tiny nation. The U.N. has voted to remove the embargo twice, but the U.S., our good buddy Israel, and the Marshall Islands (I bet because of political pressure), vetoed the proposals.

So here we are today, the Cuban leader is finally dying, but is going to hand over power to his brother, who is of course, more radical than his predecessor. As you should have read above, Condoleeza Rice is going to address the Cuban people via radio, and tell them to raise up and change their government. You know, do what we did to the English, do what the Baltics did to the USSR... stand up for your rights and save yourselves from your tyrannical and evil government.

Are we fucking serious? Do we really think that the broke ass people of Cuba, who have no weapons, no food, no energy to work hard, and let alone don't possess any civil rights, are going to make a surge against the oppressive government that they've been forced to live under for years? Sure, it sounds great, but it ain't gonna happen. The Cuban goverment and the Castros would execute everyone before they let that happen.

We're the big guy, who's realistically responsible for SOME of their plight, in the least, and we're telling the people that we've made more impoverished than they would be without our embargo to rise up and fight their government.

I would normally give Condi a lot of credit for being a diplomat, but whoever is the brainchild behind this idea should be ostracized. Hypocrites.

Then, on top of us making this bold and hypocritical statement, we tell them to "remain in Cuba" while they fight for democracy. I love this country, but we can sure be assholes sometimes.

JENKINS 2012 :D

It Changed the Gravity, Dude!

Check this out:

Earth's Gravity Changes

Okay so...

From what I have learned through my courses (2) on space/time/relativity, (one of them was specifically on the geometry of space) is that gravity is caused by massive bodies in space literally warping space and time. It has to do with measuring things on a sphere, and marking things with reference to a starting point (a reference frame), and marking things within TIME in that reference frame. A little bit of mental exhaustion will easily demonstrate to you how hard this stuff is to comprehend, let alone figure out mathematically.

The Quickest Breakdown of Relativity, Ever:

When deciding where to position things in space, whether in physicality or in time, we cannot choose one reference frame, ALL reference frames are equally valid. For instance, the way I view a ball bouncing on earth and the way a guy travelling in a rocketship views that same ball are going to differ. Although he will see the ball bounce much slower than I, our points of reference are equally valid, and both of our calculations to determine that object's position in space and time are right and must be both accepted and acknowledged. The ramifications fall out in what I believe are called K-Equations or K-Scale equations (I'll post an update later after I check out my books), which are to determine geometrical shape in space.

The main point in relation (pun not intended) to this article is that the earth has gravity because it takes up so much space that it warps the space and time around it, and everything falls downward towards earth, along those warping lines.

SO...

this article is saying that the earth has changed its shape (because of that earthquake) so that the shape it originally made in the universe has been altered, and the spots where the plates shifted now attract things differently. (Mind you, they don't attract things to it, it's that the shape has changed and thus, the warped lines are shaped differently.)

This is pretty nuts, but I'm surprised that they're immediately talking about gravity ramifications rather than shape ramifications. If our earth changes its shape enough that on a major scale it's enough to actually alter the way space and time are shaped around it, it must have changed enough to produce visible signs. I guess this could result in new mountain ranges or something similar, unfortunately for Kodak, the new mountains are at the bottom of the ocean.

...and people always tell me they'd rather deal with earthquakes than tornados and hurricanes.

(if you find anything wrong with the information I've provided here, please, please let me know)

Clean Cheeks

I can't wait for this to hit the U.S.

Cubing Melons

In case you didn't make the mental leap, this means that when you eat a slice, you wont get watermelon all over your cheeks! Damn those quarter-circle pieces!

:D

Landis, Bo-Bandis, Banana-fanna, Fo-Fandis

I spend a lot of time watching sports and analyzing sports. I would never say that bicycling is a favorite of mine, but I still understand the magnitude of the Tour de France and will follow it for the knowledge if nothing more. Lance Armstrong was the man. When I was younger, I watched for any American guy that I could, and he ended up being the only name I could ever remember. Unfortunately, Lance was pretty piss-poor back in the day and I always ragged on him for being a choke-artist.

I have since been proven wrong. Seven times. You all know the story, so I won't reiterate. However, the impact he's made on the bicycling world will last forever. Unfortunately, some people don't really realize what his story means. I will elaborate:

Floyd Landis won the Tour de France this year. He's an American and is therefore hated and scrutinized by the French media, among others. One problem: He cheated. With all the criticism that Armstrong received for alleged doping (but never a failed test), one would venture to assume that everyone else (especially the Americans) would be really focused on their cheating habits. Unfortunately, we're banking on Floyd Landis, and he's a moron.

Not only did he take synthetic testosterone, but he took it as a serious contender to win the Tour, and took it as an American, attempting to follow up the reign of the greatest bicycle rider in the history of the modern world. Did he really think that they wouldn't screen the hell out of his urine? Did he really think that he'd just simply get away with it? If one breaks it down, it's obvious that taking drugs is a completely conscious decision, and ramifications are wrought through the mind upon doing so. This isn't just a bad choice people, this is blatant retardation. Calculated, deliberate, and hopeful. Hopeful that he wouldn't get caught, I guess. Talk about a leap of faith. Anyway... check out the latest.

The Lawyer's Got Talent... or Not

"I wouldn't say that they know. I would say they can presume. They do not have the certainty," Buxeda said.
--Now, how much is this lawyer being paid to say shit like this?

...Don't get me wrong, I'm praying that some young Frenchie comes forward and says he tainted the sample or there was some sort of erroneous test results... SOMETHING. I would love for the Americans to continue to reign...

...but now even Lance will have more defending to do.

Oh My God

See what happens when people are given the right to start up private schools:

Ohio Nutjob

There are so many people in this country that every single weird idea becomes a belief, somehow, somewhere...

How the Churchgoers Should Modify Their Attitude

This is something that I wrote a while back for my MySpace blog... I figure it's blogspot quality.


Honestly, the whole Evoltuion vs. Creationism (which is now Intelligent Design) debate is absolutely LUDICROUS. Here's why:

You see, Mr. Charles Darwin found a brilliant THEORY (defn: a SUPPOSITION or a system of ideas intedended to explain something.) about how things in our world change and develop over time. The Galapagos finches were the main inspiration to start really pumping out a theory. Somehow, these finches needed to modify their beak size to eat specific seeds that were on the island. They never had to before, because there was plenty of water and seeds of all sizes for all types of birds and beak sizes. When the drought came, many of the birdies started dying off. Some, however, actually DEVELOPED/CHANGED their beak size over a couple generations. These birds NEEDED to modify their physical features for survival on this island. Thus, Darwin developed the Theory of Evolution. Basically, all living things experience environmental factors that will change the necessity of their makeup. These changes will occur over a many generations. Originally, one or a few of the organisms will form a mutation. However, once this mutation becomes beneficial, it becomes part of the genetic code and is passed on to the offspring. (One finch got a better beak for small seeds and passed it on to its babies because that was the only way they would continue to exist) Change out of NECESSITY. Evolution never states that things will just change, like many of the Churchies say about us "springing" from apes to humans. ONE example: Apes walk really low to the ground, and it became advantageous for us to stand up. The heat in Africa, yes, I said it, AFRICA, beat on our backs as apes and we had to stand up; it decreases the angle of the sun to our surface area and thus makes us cooler. Then we had developments in the mind, such as Homo Habilius, who decided it was a good idea to make a hammer, because you can bust open a nut and eat it. Ahh, brilliance emerging.

Now there is this "new idea" sweeping through the bible belt in America, and it's getting ridiculous, if I do say so myself. You see, people that are religious will never stray from the idea that there is a God and he is all knowing and all powerful. They feel that evolution challenges the existence of God and his "plan." That's where these people go wrong. Instead of being so defensive, they should realize that evolution is a system (an imperfect theory, mind you; but who's philosophy is impeccable? NO ONE.) that explains the world that we live in. It is an explanation of the SYSTEM THAT EXISTS. It does not say anything about how it was created, or who the fuck created it. So, if you're tapping a bible every night or every time you get into a science class, relax. The Theory of Evolution CAN COINSIDE WITH THE EXISTENCE OF A GOD. Shit, the world got here somehow, didn't it? Why not that be what God did. You know what, you could even adapt it to support your antagonizing theory of Intelligent Design: God made everything (intelligently) and he set up a system for how things would evolve with the factors that change on the Earth, and that system is evolution. Problem solved, stop complaining, and getting in the way of progress. Let them learn, stop being so anti-science or anti-God. They can coexist and SHOULD.

By the way, the Intelligent Design scientists that you see preaching about this bullshit are ALL religious. They found a way to refute some of Darwin's points (obviously, nothing is perfect) and therefore, they're cutting it out completely. (See: Darwin can't get to the Flagellar Motor) It's really convenient that they can do that, and then say that, "God did it, we can't understand." Fucking cop-out bastards.

There's my two cents. Hope you enjoyed. :D

Welcome

It will be difficult, and lord knows how much I quit projects that I get myself all hyped-up on, but I will attempt to post at least one blog per day. Ranging from political criticism to sports information, I will attempt to keep you all well-informed and on the path to understanding all the information that floats around in our fishbowl of life. Merry Christmas, Happy Reading.